Bangladesh → United States
This score represents Bangladesh's relationship toward United States. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
1 documented factor produce the -10 security assessment.
Why this score?
- -10Human-rights sanctions create targeted political frictionActive event · 2021
The United States sanctioned the Rapid Action Battalion and officials over serious human-rights abuse allegations; the measures were targeted rather than sector-wide.
Coverage gap: Annual exercises and assistance did not meet the frozen exceptional-integration threshold.
2 documented factors produce the -5 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Standing partnership and security dialoguesBaseline rule · 2015
The governments maintained recurring bilateral forums covering political, economic, security and regional issues.
- -15Human-rights sanctions create targeted political frictionActive event · 2021
The United States sanctioned the Rapid Action Battalion and officials over serious human-rights abuse allegations; the measures were targeted rather than sector-wide.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: 2015 reporter-side trade remained below the frozen threshold and no qualifying economic-dialogue outcome was evidenced.
2 documented factors produce the -20 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Peacekeeping and regional-security cooperationBaseline rule · 2015
Long-running cooperation covered UN peacekeeping, counterterrorism, maritime security and defense institution building.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Stable diplomatic relationship without bilateral claimsBaseline rule · 2015
Official records describe cordial cooperation and managed policy differences without an active bilateral territorial dispute.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish a national-scale exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
+1 in 2015 → -5 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
3 points
Bangladesh → United States and United States → Bangladesh remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Human-rights sanctions create targeted political friction
The United States sanctioned the Rapid Action Battalion and officials over serious human-rights abuse allegations; the measures were targeted rather than sector-wide.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →