THE WORLD, CONNECTED
DIRECTIONAL RELATIONSHIP · 2026

China → Czechia

This score represents China's relationship toward Czechia. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.

CHN → CZE+18Cooperative73% evidence confidenceDocumented bilateral evidence
CZE → CHN+21Cooperative3-point gap · not analytically meaningful
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL

Current component scores

Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.

Security0

No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.

Why this score?

The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.

Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen mutual-defence or exceptional-security rule.

Diplomacy+40

2 documented factors produce the +40 diplomacy assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +20Leader-level engagement with documented outcomes
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen leader-level engagement with documented outcomes criterion for China and Czechia in 2015.

  2. +20Strategic partnership established
    Active event · 2016

    The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Czechia; it is not backdated into the baseline.

Economic+25

4 documented factors produce the +25 economic assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15Institutional economic cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen institutional economic cooperation criterion for China and Czechia in 2015.

  2. +20Bilateral trade threshold
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.

  3. +10Strategic partnership established
    Active event · 2016

    The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Czechia; it is not backdated into the baseline.

  4. -20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculation
    Annual recalculation · 2026

    The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.

Alignment+20

2 documented factors produce the +20 alignment assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +10Sustained multilateral cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen sustained multilateral cooperation criterion for China and Czechia in 2015.

  2. +10Strategic partnership established
    Active event · 2016

    The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Czechia; it is not backdated into the baseline.

Societal0

No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.

Why this score?

The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.

Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.

CHANGE SINCE 2015

+14 in 2015 → +18 in 2026

The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.

ACTIVE EVIDENCE

Events affecting the current score

+7

Strategic partnership established

The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Czechia; it is not backdated into the baseline.

Interpret with care

This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.

Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →