China → Nauru
This score represents China's relationship toward Nauru. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen mutual-defence or exceptional-security rule.
2 documented factors produce the +35 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- -15Serious unresolved political frictionBaseline rule · 2015
The reviewed official record supports the frozen serious unresolved political friction criterion for China and Nauru in 2015.
- +50Diplomatic relations established or resumedActive event · 2024
The official communiqué records the post-2015 establishment or resumption of ambassador-level diplomatic relations; it is not backdated into the baseline.
1 documented factor produce the +15 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Diplomatic relations established or resumedActive event · 2024
The official communiqué records the post-2015 establishment or resumption of ambassador-level diplomatic relations; it is not backdated into the baseline.
Coverage gap: 2015 reporter trade was below the frozen threshold or unavailable, and no qualifying bilateral economic institution was evidenced.
1 documented factor produce the +10 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Diplomatic relations established or resumedActive event · 2024
The official communiqué records the post-2015 establishment or resumption of ambassador-level diplomatic relations; it is not backdated into the baseline.
Coverage gap: Neither the 2015 UN-vote threshold nor the reviewed record establishes an additional frozen alignment rule.
1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Diplomatic relations established or resumedActive event · 2024
The official communiqué records the post-2015 establishment or resumption of ambassador-level diplomatic relations; it is not backdated into the baseline.
Coverage gap: The review does not activate an additional frozen territorial, coercion or settled-order rule.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
-3 in 2015 → +14 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
China → Nauru and Nauru → China remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →Events affecting the current score
Diplomatic relations established or resumed
The official communiqué records the post-2015 establishment or resumption of ambassador-level diplomatic relations; it is not backdated into the baseline.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →