Denmark → Iran
This score represents Denmark's relationship toward Iran. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen security rule for the 2015 baseline.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen bilateral diplomatic rule for the 2015 baseline.
3 documented factors produce the -40 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- -40EU sanctions applied toward IranBaseline rule · 2015
As an EU member, the counterpart implemented nuclear-related financial, energy, trade and technology restrictions toward Iran in the 2015 baseline.
- +40EU lifts nuclear-related economic sanctionsActive event · 2016
On JCPOA Implementation Day, the EU lifted nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions toward Iran.
- -40EU expands sectoral restrictions toward IranActive event · 2023
EU measures expanded across military support, missiles, drones, human rights and designated persons and entities.
No baseline rule or active event moves this component away from neutral.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: No qualifying frozen dispute or dispute-settlement rule is activated by the reviewed evidence.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish the exceptional or strong exchange required by a frozen societal rule.
-6 in 2015 → -6 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
3 points
Denmark → Iran and Iran → Denmark remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
EU lifts nuclear-related economic sanctions
On JCPOA Implementation Day, the EU lifted nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions toward Iran.
EU expands sectoral restrictions toward Iran
EU measures expanded across military support, missiles, drones, human rights and designated persons and entities.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →