Iran → Sweden
This score represents Iran's relationship toward Sweden. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen security rule for the 2015 baseline.
3 documented factors produce the -15 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- -15Iran-EU nuclear and sanctions frictionBaseline rule · 2015
Iran's relationship with the counterpart was constrained in 2015 by the EU nuclear-sanctions regime and the political dispute surrounding it.
- +15JCPOA implementation eases Iran-EU political frictionActive event · 2016
Implementation Day lifted the EU's nuclear-related economic sanctions and reduced the central bilateral political dispute.
- -15EU restrictions deepen Iran-EU political frictionActive event · 2023
Expanded EU restrictive measures connected to human rights, military support and proliferation renewed substantial political friction.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: Reporter-side 2015 goods trade does not reach a frozen material-trade threshold, or is unavailable, and no reviewed standing agreement activates another rule.
No baseline rule or active event moves this component away from neutral.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: No qualifying frozen dispute or dispute-settlement rule is activated by the reviewed evidence.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish the exceptional or strong exchange required by a frozen societal rule.
-3 in 2015 → -3 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
3 points
Iran → Sweden and Sweden → Iran remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
JCPOA implementation eases Iran-EU political friction
Implementation Day lifted the EU's nuclear-related economic sanctions and reduced the central bilateral political dispute.
EU restrictions deepen Iran-EU political friction
Expanded EU restrictive measures connected to human rights, military support and proliferation renewed substantial political friction.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →