THE WORLD, CONNECTED
DIRECTIONAL RELATIONSHIP · 2026

Qatar → United States

This score represents Qatar's relationship toward United States. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.

QAT → USA+34Cooperative91% evidence confidenceBroad sourced evidence
USA → QAT+34CooperativeSymmetric current scores
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL

Current component scores

Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.

Security+55

3 documented factors produce the +55 security assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +19.6Al Udeid basing and coalition operations underpin deep integration
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Qatar hosted U.S. forces at Al Udeid and cooperated operationally in the coalition against ISIL.

  2. +15Qatar designated a Major Non-NATO Ally
    Active event · 2022

    The presidential determination formally elevated Qatar's defense-cooperation status without creating a mutual-defense treaty.

  3. +20Executive security assurance strengthens deterrence
    Active event · 2025

    The United States adopted a policy to guarantee Qatar's security and territorial integrity against external attack; this remains an executive assurance, not a ratified treaty.

Diplomacy+61

6 documented factors produce the +61 diplomacy assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15.7Emir's White House visit advanced a broad agenda
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The leaders reached a documented meeting of minds on security, regional diplomacy, commerce, education and technology.

  2. +7.8Continuing leader and security-policy coordination
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official record documents continued dialogue and coordination across multiple regional crises and security initiatives.

  3. +27.4Strong multi-domain strategic relationship
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Both leaders described a strong strategic relationship spanning military, commercial, educational, scientific and technological fields.

  4. -15Unresolved differences over terrorist financing
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The United States publicly recorded that Qatar needed to do more to restrict private financing of terrorist organizations.

  5. +15Qatar designated a Major Non-NATO Ally
    Active event · 2022

    The presidential determination formally elevated Qatar's defense-cooperation status without creating a mutual-defense treaty.

  6. +10Executive security assurance strengthens deterrence
    Active event · 2025

    The United States adopted a policy to guarantee Qatar's security and territorial integrity against external attack; this remains an executive assurance, not a ratified treaty.

Economic0

No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.

Why this score?

The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.

Coverage gap: 2015 reporter-side trade remained below the frozen threshold and no institutional economic dialogue was established by the reviewed record.

Alignment+9

2 documented factors produce the +9 alignment assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +39.2Cross-domain cooperation on major regional priorities
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The governments coordinated on ISIL, Iraq, Syria, Iran and political solutions across the region.

  2. -30United Nations voting alignment
    Baseline rule · 2015

    A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.

CHANGE SINCE 2015

+17 in 2015 → +34 in 2026

The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.

ACTIVE EVIDENCE

Events affecting the current score

+8

Qatar designated a Major Non-NATO Ally

The presidential determination formally elevated Qatar's defense-cooperation status without creating a mutual-defense treaty.

+8

Executive security assurance strengthens deterrence

The United States adopted a policy to guarantee Qatar's security and territorial integrity against external attack; this remains an executive assurance, not a ratified treaty.

Interpret with care

This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.

Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →