Slovenia → Italy
This score represents Slovenia's relationship toward Italy. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
1 documented factor produce the +60 security assessment.
Why this score?
- +60Shared North Atlantic Treaty obligationBaseline rule · 2015
Italy and the counterpart were NATO allies in 2015 and shared the treaty's collective-defence obligation.
1 documented factor produce the +20 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +20European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen bilateral diplomatic rule for the 2015 baseline.
3 documented factors produce the +75 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Shared European Union economic frameworkBaseline rule · 2015
Italy and the counterpart participated in the EU single-market and standing economic-policy framework in 2015.
- +25European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
- +35Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
3 documented factors produce the +60 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Shared Union for the Mediterranean frameworkBaseline rule · 2015
Italy and the counterpart participated in the Union for the Mediterranean's standing regional cooperation framework in 2015.
- +20European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
- +30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: No qualifying frozen dispute or dispute-settlement rule is activated by the reviewed evidence.
1 documented factor produce the +15 societal assessment.
Why this score?
- +15European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish the exceptional or strong exchange required by a frozen societal rule.
+39 in 2015 → +45 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
2 points
Slovenia → Italy and Italy → Slovenia remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
No later scored event is active. The current result remains anchored to the reviewed 2015 baseline and quantitative series.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →