THE WORLD, CONNECTED
DIRECTIONAL RELATIONSHIP · 2026

United Arab Emirates → China

This score represents United Arab Emirates's relationship toward China. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.

ARE → CHN+17Cooperative73% evidence confidenceDocumented bilateral evidence
CHN → ARE+17CooperativeSymmetric current scores
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL

Current component scores

Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.

Security0

No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.

Why this score?

The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.

Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen bilateral security rule or mutual-defence obligation.

Diplomacy+30

2 documented factors produce the +30 diplomacy assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +10Recurring institutional dialogue
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen recurring institutional dialogue criterion for China and the United Arab Emirates in 2015.

  2. +20Comprehensive strategic partnership established
    Active event · 2018

    The 2018 upgrade broadened political and economic cooperation beyond the 2015 baseline.

Economic+30

4 documented factors produce the +30 economic assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15Institutional economic cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen institutional economic cooperation criterion for China and the United Arab Emirates in 2015.

  2. +20Bilateral trade threshold
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.

  3. +15Comprehensive strategic partnership established
    Active event · 2018

    The 2018 upgrade broadened political and economic cooperation beyond the 2015 baseline.

  4. -20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculation
    Annual recalculation · 2026

    The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.

Alignment+25

2 documented factors produce the +25 alignment assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15United Nations voting alignment
    Baseline rule · 2015

    A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.

  2. +10Comprehensive strategic partnership established
    Active event · 2018

    The 2018 upgrade broadened political and economic cooperation beyond the 2015 baseline.

Disputes+15

1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15Managed and non-territorial bilateral order
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen managed and non-territorial bilateral order criterion for China and the United Arab Emirates in 2015.

Societal0

No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.

Why this score?

The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.

Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.

CHANGE SINCE 2015

+12 in 2015 → +17 in 2026

The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.

ACTIVE EVIDENCE

Events affecting the current score

+8

Comprehensive strategic partnership established

The 2018 upgrade broadened political and economic cooperation beyond the 2015 baseline.

Interpret with care

This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.

Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →