THE WORLD, CONNECTED
EUROPE · LTU

Lithuania geopolitical profile

National context alongside 69 of 194 possible reviewed directions from Lithuania. Relationship scores remain directional: the reverse country view may differ.

19Partner6Cooperative42Mixed1Competitive1Adversarial
LATEST AVAILABLE · SOURCE YEAR SHOWN

Country snapshot

Comparable national indicators provide context only. They do not enter the geopolitical relationship score.

Economy

People & place

Global context

2026 OUTLOOK · ESTIMATES

Current-year economic outlook

IMF projections are shown separately from observed World Bank data and may be revised.

GDP$105.9BESTIMATE 2026 · latest actual 2025
GDP per capita$36.5KESTIMATE 2026 · latest actual 2025
Real GDP growth2.9%ESTIMATE 2026 · latest actual 2025
Inflation4%ESTIMATE 2026 · latest actual 2025
Unemployment6.5%ESTIMATE 2026 · latest actual 2025

IMF World Economic Outlook · April 2026 database · published 2026-04-14 · downloaded 2026-09-25

World Bank Indicators API · downloaded 2026-09-17 · each card uses its latest available year · CC BY 4.0

ATLAS-DERIVED · ENGINE 1.0

Geopolitical position

A relational fingerprint calculated only from reviewed directions. Coverage is stated beside every aggregate.

Average toward reviewed countries+1269 directions reviewed
Average from reviewed countries+1269 directions reviewed
Cooperative or stronger25Scores of +10 or above
Competitive or worse2Scores of −10 or below
CURRENT REVIEWED LAYER

Relationships from Lithuania

Sorted from highest to lowest for navigation, not as a league table. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties. Select a row for the evidence-backed directional page and its reciprocal comparison.

CountryScoreBandConfidenceEvidence
GermanyLTU → DEU+41Partner89%Broad sourced evidencePolandLTU → POL+41Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceUnited StatesLTU → USA+40Partner95%Broad sourced evidenceItalyLTU → ITA+39Partner92%Broad sourced evidenceNetherlandsLTU → NLD+39Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceSwedenLTU → SWE+39Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceBelgiumLTU → BEL+35Partner86%Broad sourced evidenceBulgariaLTU → BGR+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceCroatiaLTU → HRV+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceCzechiaLTU → CZE+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceDenmarkLTU → DNK+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceFinlandLTU → FIN+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceFranceLTU → FRA+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceGreeceLTU → GRC+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceHungaryLTU → HUN+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidencePortugalLTU → PRT+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceRomaniaLTU → ROU+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceSlovakiaLTU → SVK+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceSpainLTU → ESP+35Partner89%Broad sourced evidenceCanadaLTU → CAN+26Cooperative77%Broad sourced evidenceNorwayLTU → NOR+26Cooperative77%Broad sourced evidenceUnited KingdomLTU → GBR+26Cooperative80%Broad sourced evidenceTürkiyeLTU → TUR+22Cooperative74%Documented bilateral evidenceIrelandLTU → IRL+16Cooperative65%Documented bilateral evidenceAustriaLTU → AUT+14Cooperative65%Documented bilateral evidenceUkraineLTU → UKR+9Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceSouth KoreaLTU → KOR+7Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceJapanLTU → JPN+6Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceMoroccoLTU → MAR+6Mixed60%Broad sourced evidenceAustraliaLTU → AUS+5Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyMexicoLTU → MEX+5Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceSwitzerlandLTU → CHE+5Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceAlgeriaLTU → DZA+4Mixed60%Broad sourced evidenceEgyptLTU → EGY+4Mixed60%Broad sourced evidenceIndiaLTU → IND+4Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceIsraelLTU → ISR+4Mixed60%Broad sourced evidenceBrazilLTU → BRA+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyChileLTU → CHL+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyColombiaLTU → COL+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyDominican RepublicLTU → DOM+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyEcuadorLTU → ECU+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyGuatemalaLTU → GTM+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyKuwaitLTU → KWT+2Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceNew ZealandLTU → NZL+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyPakistanLTU → PAK+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyPeruLTU → PER+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyPhilippinesLTU → PHL+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyQatarLTU → QAT+2Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceSingaporeLTU → SGP+2Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlySouth AfricaLTU → ZAF+2Mixed57%Documented bilateral evidenceThailandLTU → THA+2Mixed42%Quantitative indicators onlyAngolaLTU → AGO0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyArgentinaLTU → ARG0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyBangladeshLTU → BGD0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyEthiopiaLTU → ETH0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyGhanaLTU → GHA0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyIndonesiaLTU → IDN0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyIraqLTU → IRQ0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyKazakhstanLTU → KAZ0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyKenyaLTU → KEN0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyMalaysiaLTU → MYS0Mixed42%Quantitative indicators onlyNigeriaLTU → NGA0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlySaudi ArabiaLTU → SAU0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyUnited Arab EmiratesLTU → ARE0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyUzbekistanLTU → UZB0Mixed54%Quantitative indicators onlyVietnamLTU → VNM0Mixed42%Quantitative indicators onlyIranLTU → IRN-6Mixed60%Documented bilateral evidenceChinaLTU → CHN-10Competitive79%Broad sourced evidenceRussiaLTU → RUS-39Adversarial92%Broad sourced evidence
Methodology v1.1.1 frozen

Every component begins at zero. Only documented rules and measured thresholds alter the score; unavailable evidence is not converted into a neutral assumption. Gaps below 5 points should not be interpreted as a meaningful ranking.