Lithuania → China
This score represents Lithuania's relationship toward China. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen mutual-defence or exceptional-security rule.
2 documented factors produce the -40 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Recurring institutional dialogueBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record supports the frozen recurring institutional dialogue criterion for China and Lithuania in 2015.
- -50Diplomatic relations downgraded to chargé d'affaires levelActive event · 2021
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Lithuania; it is not backdated into the baseline.
2 documented factors produce the -5 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Institutional economic cooperationBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record supports the frozen institutional economic cooperation criterion for China and Lithuania in 2015.
- -20Diplomatic relations downgraded to chargé d'affaires levelActive event · 2021
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Lithuania; it is not backdated into the baseline.
2 documented factors produce the -10 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Sustained multilateral cooperationBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record supports the frozen sustained multilateral cooperation criterion for China and Lithuania in 2015.
- -20Diplomatic relations downgraded to chargé d'affaires levelActive event · 2021
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Lithuania; it is not backdated into the baseline.
2 documented factors produce the +5 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Managed and non-territorial bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record supports the frozen managed and non-territorial bilateral order criterion for China and Lithuania in 2015.
- -10Diplomatic relations downgraded to chargé d'affaires levelActive event · 2021
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Lithuania; it is not backdated into the baseline.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
+8 in 2015 → -10 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
Lithuania → China and China → Lithuania remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Diplomatic relations downgraded to chargé d'affaires level
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Lithuania; it is not backdated into the baseline.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →