THE WORLD, CONNECTED
DIRECTIONAL RELATIONSHIP · 2026

United States → China

This score represents United States's relationship toward China. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.

USA → CHN-57Adversarial95% evidence confidenceBroad sourced evidence
CHN → USA-61Adversarial4-point gap · not analytically meaningful
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL

Current component scores

Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.

Security-100

5 documented factors produce the -100 security assessment.

Why this score?
  1. -40Military modernization challenges U.S. advantages
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The Defense Department assessed that Chinese modernization and regional contingencies could reduce core U.S. military advantages.

  2. +15Air-safety and crisis-communication measures
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The state visit completed new confidence-building annexes for air-to-air safety and crisis communications.

  3. -35China becomes the pacing security challenge
    Active event · 2021

    U.S. defence strategy prioritises China as the principal long-term military and strategic challenge.

  4. -32Advanced semiconductor controls
    Active event · 2022

    National-security export controls restrict advanced computing and semiconductor capabilities.

  5. -8Technology controls broaden
    Active event · 2024

    Additional semiconductor manufacturing controls deepen the economic-security dispute.

Diplomacy+21

5 documented factors produce the +21 diplomacy assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +20Xi state visit produces bilateral commitments
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The presidents documented cooperation across security, development, health, climate and bilateral relations.

  2. +10Standing economic and strategic dialogues
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Official records document recurring senior economic and strategic channels with concrete 2015 outcomes.

  3. -15Serious cyber-security friction remains
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Leader-level commitments addressed unresolved cyber theft and malicious cyber activity, indicating material political friction despite dialogue.

  4. -10Section 301 tariffs imposed
    Active event · 2018

    Additional U.S. tariffs turn economic friction into a durable coercive instrument.

  5. +16High-level dialogue resumes
    Active event · 2023

    Restored leader and working-level channels partly repair diplomacy without removing structural competition.

Economic-53

7 documented factors produce the -53 economic assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15Institutional economic cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The JCCT and Strategic and Economic Dialogue produced documented trade and investment outcomes.

  2. -15Material WTO compliance disputes
    Baseline rule · 2015

    USTR identified persistent disputes involving intellectual property, state-owned enterprises, services, agriculture and transparency.

  3. +50Bilateral trade threshold
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.

  4. -28Advanced semiconductor controls
    Active event · 2022

    National-security export controls restrict advanced computing and semiconductor capabilities.

  5. -48Section 301 tariffs imposed
    Active event · 2018

    Additional U.S. tariffs turn economic friction into a durable coercive instrument.

  6. -12Technology controls broaden
    Active event · 2024

    Additional semiconductor manufacturing controls deepen the economic-security dispute.

  7. -15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculation
    Annual recalculation · 2026

    The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.

Alignment-55

3 documented factors produce the -55 alignment assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +10Broad global-issues cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Joint commitments covered climate, development, peacekeeping, nuclear security, public health and humanitarian response.

  2. -30United Nations voting alignment
    Baseline rule · 2015

    A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.

  3. -35China becomes the pacing security challenge
    Active event · 2021

    U.S. defence strategy prioritises China as the principal long-term military and strategic challenge.

Disputes-82

5 documented factors produce the -82 disputes assessment.

Why this score?
  1. -40Coercive maritime behavior
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The Defense Department documented low-intensity coercion and growing tensions in East and South China Sea disputes.

  2. -20Cyber-enabled theft dispute
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The presidents addressed cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property and established an escalation mechanism.

  3. +15Cyber and military escalation guardrails
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The parties adopted hotlines, expert dialogue and operational safety measures to manage escalation risks.

  4. -25China becomes the pacing security challenge
    Active event · 2021

    U.S. defence strategy prioritises China as the principal long-term military and strategic challenge.

  5. -12Advanced semiconductor controls
    Active event · 2022

    National-security export controls restrict advanced computing and semiconductor capabilities.

CHANGE SINCE 2015

-7 in 2015 → -57 in 2026

The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.

ACTIVE EVIDENCE

Events affecting the current score

-21

China becomes the pacing security challenge

U.S. defence strategy prioritises China as the principal long-term military and strategic challenge.

-17

Advanced semiconductor controls

National-security export controls restrict advanced computing and semiconductor capabilities.

-10

Section 301 tariffs imposed

Additional U.S. tariffs turn economic friction into a durable coercive instrument.

-4

Technology controls broaden

Additional semiconductor manufacturing controls deepen the economic-security dispute.

+3

High-level dialogue resumes

Restored leader and working-level channels partly repair diplomacy without removing structural competition.

Interpret with care

This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.

Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →