Reino Unido → Francia
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Reino Unido hacia Francia. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +60NATO collective-defence obligationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The United Kingdom and France remained bound by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.
- +22.56Exceptional nuclear and operational integrationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The Lancaster House framework combines nuclear facilities, embedded officers, operational deployments, missile cooperation and a joint expeditionary force.
- +10Lancaster House 2.0 modernises joint defenceActive event · 2025 · resumen original
The governments coordinate nuclear deterrence and broaden integration across military, intelligence, cyber, industrial and economic-security policy.
6 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +9.03Intensive ministerial and security dialogueBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The governments recorded nine ministerial meetings in a year alongside standing dialogue on defence, intelligence, cyber and foreign policy.
- +31.59Long-term Lancaster House partnershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The governments describe the treaties as an historic, long-term commitment grounded in shared interests, values and responsibilities.
- +20European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
- +10Bilateral summit deepens defence and societal tiesActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders expand operational integration, Ukraine support, economic resilience, cross-border cooperation and exchanges between their citizens.
- +5Lancaster House 2.0 modernises joint defenceActive event · 2025 · resumen original
The governments coordinate nuclear deterrence and broaden integration across military, intelligence, cyber, industrial and economic-security policy.
- -20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +25European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- +10Bilateral summit deepens defence and societal tiesActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders expand operational integration, Ukraine support, economic resilience, cross-border cooperation and exchanges between their citizens.
- -25Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
6 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +45.13Broad bilateral security alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The governments documented aligned threat assessments and coordinated action across defence, nuclear policy, cyber, intelligence and international security.
- +20European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
- +30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +10Bilateral summit deepens defence and societal tiesActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders expand operational integration, Ukraine support, economic resilience, cross-border cooperation and exchanges between their citizens.
- +5Lancaster House 2.0 modernises joint defenceActive event · 2025 · resumen original
The governments coordinate nuclear deterrence and broaden integration across military, intelligence, cyber, industrial and economic-security policy.
- -10Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +13.54Durable cooperative bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The treaty-based partnership records no active territorial claim and manages policy disagreements inside a durable cooperative framework.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15European Union co-membershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Shared EU law, institutions and market integration add a defined structural package.
- +20Bilateral summit deepens defence and societal tiesActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders expand operational integration, Ukraine support, economic resilience, cross-border cooperation and exchanges between their citizens.
- +5Lancaster House 2.0 modernises joint defenceActive event · 2025 · resumen original
The governments coordinate nuclear deterrence and broaden integration across military, intelligence, cyber, industrial and economic-security policy.
- -15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed 2015 defence record documents extensive personnel exchange but does not establish the wider national-scale societal criterion in the frozen v1 rubric.
+64 en 2015 → +63 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
0 puntos
Las direcciones GBR → FRA y FRA → GBR son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →