Israel → South Africa
This score represents Israel's relationship toward South Africa. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen security rule for the 2015 baseline.
1 documented factor produce the -15 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- -15South Africa brings Gaza Convention case against IsraelActive event · 2023
South Africa instituted proceedings against Israel before the International Court of Justice, marking a major bilateral political and legal confrontation.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen bilateral diplomatic rule for the 2015 baseline.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: Reporter-side 2015 goods trade does not reach a frozen material-trade threshold, or is unavailable, and no reviewed standing agreement activates another rule.
1 documented factor produce the -30 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
1 documented factor produce the -20 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- -20South Africa brings Gaza Convention case against IsraelActive event · 2023
South Africa instituted proceedings against Israel before the International Court of Justice, marking a major bilateral political and legal confrontation.
Coverage gap: No qualifying frozen dispute or dispute-settlement rule is activated by the reviewed evidence.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish the exceptional or strong exchange required by a frozen societal rule.
-5 in 2015 → -11 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
Israel → South Africa and South Africa → Israel remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
South Africa brings Gaza Convention case against Israel
South Africa instituted proceedings against Israel before the International Court of Justice, marking a major bilateral political and legal confrontation.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →