Morocco → Egypt
This score represents Morocco's relationship toward Egypt. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen security rule for the 2015 baseline.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not activate an additional frozen bilateral diplomatic rule for the 2015 baseline.
1 documented factor produce the +15 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Shared Agadir free-trade frameworkBaseline rule · 2015
Egypt and the counterpart participated in the standing Agadir Agreement, which removed bilateral tariffs and coordinated customs implementation.
3 documented factors produce the +55 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Shared Union for the Mediterranean frameworkBaseline rule · 2015
Egypt and the counterpart participated in the standing intergovernmental forum for Euro-Mediterranean dialogue and cooperation in 2015.
- +30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +15Morocco joins the African UnionActive event · 2017
Morocco's accession placed it and Egypt within the African Union's standing continental cooperation framework.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: No qualifying frozen dispute or dispute-settlement rule is activated by the reviewed evidence.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish the exceptional or strong exchange required by a frozen societal rule.
+9 in 2015 → +11 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
Morocco → Egypt and Egypt → Morocco remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Morocco joins the African Union
Morocco's accession placed it and Egypt within the African Union's standing continental cooperation framework.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →