Panama → China
This score represents Panama's relationship toward China. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen mutual-defence or exceptional-security rule.
2 documented factors produce the +35 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- -15Serious unresolved political frictionBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record supports the frozen serious unresolved political friction criterion for China and Panama in 2015.
- +50Diplomatic relations establishedActive event · 2017
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Panama; it is not backdated into the baseline.
1 documented factor produce the +15 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Diplomatic relations establishedActive event · 2017
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Panama; it is not backdated into the baseline.
Coverage gap: 2015 reporter trade was below the frozen threshold or unavailable, and no additional qualifying economic institution was evidenced.
2 documented factors produce the +25 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +15United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +10Diplomatic relations establishedActive event · 2017
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Panama; it is not backdated into the baseline.
1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Diplomatic relations establishedActive event · 2017
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Panama; it is not backdated into the baseline.
Coverage gap: The review does not activate an additional frozen territorial, coercion or settled-order rule.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
-1 in 2015 → +16 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
Panama → China and China → Panama remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Diplomatic relations established
The official record documents this post-2015 change in relations between China and Panama; it is not backdated into the baseline.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →