Panama → United States
This score represents Panama's relationship toward United States. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen bilateral security rule beyond any separately coded treaty obligation.
1 documented factor produce the +35 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +35Durable bilateral partnershipBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record presents the U.S. relationship with Panama as a durable partnership spanning multiple policy areas.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: 2015 reporter-side trade remained below the frozen threshold or was unavailable, and no qualifying standing economic institution was evidenced.
2 documented factors produce the -20 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Cooperation on consequential multilateral issuesBaseline rule · 2015
The United States and Panama sustained official cooperation across several regional or global policy areas.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Managed and non-territorial bilateral relationshipBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record identifies no active territorial claim and treats disagreements through ordinary diplomatic channels.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish a national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
+6 in 2015 → +6 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
Panama → United States and United States → Panama remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
No later scored event is active. The current result remains anchored to the reviewed 2015 baseline and quantitative series.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →