Singapore → United States
This score represents Singapore's relationship toward United States. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
2 documented factors produce the +38 security assessment.
Why this score?
- +22.6Enhanced defense cooperation and rotational accessBaseline rule · 2015
The 2015 defense agreement expanded long-running access, training, rotational deployments and cooperation in new security domains.
- +15Defense partnership expands into innovation and advanced interoperabilityActive event · 2024
The partners advanced technology cooperation, training and force interoperability while reaffirming U.S. regional access.
3 documented factors produce the +51 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +9Institutionalized defense consultationsBaseline rule · 2015
Regular high-level defense consultations and working mechanisms supported the expanded cooperation framework.
- +31.6Long-standing strategic partnershipBaseline rule · 2015
The agreement renewed and broadened a defense partnership developed over decades.
- +10Defense partnership expands into innovation and advanced interoperabilityActive event · 2024
The partners advanced technology cooperation, training and force interoperability while reaffirming U.S. regional access.
3 documented factors produce the +40 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- +5Defense partnership expands into innovation and advanced interoperabilityActive event · 2024
The partners advanced technology cooperation, training and force interoperability while reaffirming U.S. regional access.
- +15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
2 documented factors produce the +15 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +45.1Shared regional-security prioritiesBaseline rule · 2015
The partners aligned on regional stability, maritime security, humanitarian response and counterterrorism.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
1 documented factor produce the +14 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +13.5Stable cooperative bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015
The relationship operated through durable agreements without an active bilateral territorial dispute.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish a national-scale exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
+23 in 2015 → +34 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
3 points
Singapore → United States and United States → Singapore remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Defense partnership expands into innovation and advanced interoperability
The partners advanced technology cooperation, training and force interoperability while reaffirming U.S. regional access.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →