THE WORLD, CONNECTED
DIRECTIONAL RELATIONSHIP · 2026

United Kingdom → China

This score represents United Kingdom's relationship toward China. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.

GBR → CHN+7Mixed79% evidence confidenceBroad sourced evidence
CHN → GBR+1Mixed6-point directional gap
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL

Current component scores

Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.

Security0

No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.

Why this score?

The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.

Coverage gap: The reviewed official record does not establish a frozen bilateral security rule or mutual-defence obligation.

Diplomacy+10

2 documented factors produce the +10 diplomacy assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +35Enduring, multi-field diplomatic partnership
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen enduring, multi-field diplomatic partnership criterion for China and the United Kingdom in 2015.

  2. -25Hong Kong dispute sharply worsens relations
    Active event · 2020

    The United Kingdom declared China in breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, materially weakening diplomacy and strategic alignment.

Economic+40

4 documented factors produce the +40 economic assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15Institutional economic cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen institutional economic cooperation criterion for China and the United Kingdom in 2015.

  2. +20Bilateral trade threshold
    Baseline rule · 2015

    Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.

  3. -10Hong Kong dispute sharply worsens relations
    Active event · 2020

    The United Kingdom declared China in breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, materially weakening diplomacy and strategic alignment.

  4. +15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculation
    Annual recalculation · 2026

    The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.

Alignment-10

2 documented factors produce the -10 alignment assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +10Sustained multilateral cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen sustained multilateral cooperation criterion for China and the United Kingdom in 2015.

  2. -20Hong Kong dispute sharply worsens relations
    Active event · 2020

    The United Kingdom declared China in breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, materially weakening diplomacy and strategic alignment.

Disputes0

2 documented factors produce the 0 disputes assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +15Managed and non-territorial bilateral order
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen managed and non-territorial bilateral order criterion for China and the United Kingdom in 2015.

  2. -15Hong Kong dispute sharply worsens relations
    Active event · 2020

    The United Kingdom declared China in breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, materially weakening diplomacy and strategic alignment.

Societal+20

1 documented factor produce the +20 societal assessment.

Why this score?
  1. +20Strong national-scale people-to-people exchange
    Baseline rule · 2015

    The official bilateral record supports the frozen strong national-scale people-to-people exchange criterion for China and the United Kingdom in 2015.

CHANGE SINCE 2015

+17 in 2015 → +7 in 2026

The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.

ACTIVE EVIDENCE

Events affecting the current score

-12

Hong Kong dispute sharply worsens relations

The United Kingdom declared China in breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, materially weakening diplomacy and strategic alignment.

Interpret with care

This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.

Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →