United States → Argentina
This score represents United States's relationship toward Argentina. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
1 documented factor produce the 0 security assessment.
Why this score?
- +0Leaders relaunch bilateral cooperationActive event · 2016
The 2016 visit created new security, commercial, scientific and multilateral cooperation channels.
Coverage gap: No reviewed 2015 evidence activated a frozen security rule.
2 documented factors produce the +20 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +20Strategic alliance and reciprocal trade frameworkActive event · 2025
The governments reaffirmed a strategic alliance and agreed a framework for trade, investment and economic-security alignment.
- +0Leaders relaunch bilateral cooperationActive event · 2016
The 2016 visit created new security, commercial, scientific and multilateral cooperation channels.
Coverage gap: The 2016 leaders' record describes the preceding relationship as having little active bilateral engagement.
3 documented factors produce the +45 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- +25Strategic alliance and reciprocal trade frameworkActive event · 2025
The governments reaffirmed a strategic alliance and agreed a framework for trade, investment and economic-security alignment.
- +0Leaders relaunch bilateral cooperationActive event · 2016
The 2016 visit created new security, commercial, scientific and multilateral cooperation channels.
4 documented factors produce the +20 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +20Strategic alliance and reciprocal trade frameworkActive event · 2025
The governments reaffirmed a strategic alliance and agreed a framework for trade, investment and economic-security alignment.
- +0Leaders relaunch bilateral cooperationActive event · 2016
The 2016 visit created new security, commercial, scientific and multilateral cooperation channels.
- +30Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
Coverage gap: Low UN similarity is recorded; no separate 2015 broad strategic-alignment rule was supported.
1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15A settled interstate relationship without a territorial disputeBaseline rule · 2015
A settled interstate relationship without a territorial dispute.
1 documented factor produce the 0 societal assessment.
Why this score?
- +0Leaders relaunch bilateral cooperationActive event · 2016
The 2016 visit created new security, commercial, scientific and multilateral cooperation channels.
Coverage gap: No reviewed 2015 official record met the national-scale exchange threshold.
+1 in 2015 → +17 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
United States → Argentina and Argentina → United States remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Strategic alliance and reciprocal trade framework
The governments reaffirmed a strategic alliance and agreed a framework for trade, investment and economic-security alignment.
Leaders relaunch bilateral cooperation
The 2016 visit created new security, commercial, scientific and multilateral cooperation channels.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →