United States → Bahrain
This score represents United States's relationship toward Bahrain. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
2 documented factors produce the +43 security assessment.
Why this score?
- +22.6Deep basing and maritime-security integrationBaseline rule · 2015
Bahrain hosted major U.S. naval capabilities within a Gulf framework of basing, information sharing, exercises, equipment and training.
- +20Comprehensive security and prosperity agreementActive event · 2023
C-SIPA created a new framework for security consultation, defense integration, economic cooperation and technology ties.
3 documented factors produce the +56 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +9Standing Gulf and bilateral security consultationsBaseline rule · 2015
The relationship operated through recurring strategic and operational consultation mechanisms.
- +31.6Long-standing strategic partnershipBaseline rule · 2015
Both governments placed the bilateral relationship within a durable partnership spanning security and regional stability.
- +15Comprehensive security and prosperity agreementActive event · 2023
C-SIPA created a new framework for security consultation, defense integration, economic cooperation and technology ties.
1 documented factor produce the +10 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Comprehensive security and prosperity agreementActive event · 2023
C-SIPA created a new framework for security consultation, defense integration, economic cooperation and technology ties.
Coverage gap: 2015 reporter-side trade remained below the frozen threshold and no qualifying economic dialogue was evidenced.
3 documented factors produce the +25 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +45.1Shared regional-security agendaBaseline rule · 2015
The partners coordinated on counterterrorism, maritime security, missile defense and regional conflict stabilization.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +10Comprehensive security and prosperity agreementActive event · 2023
C-SIPA created a new framework for security consultation, defense integration, economic cooperation and technology ties.
1 documented factor produce the +14 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +13.5Stable cooperative bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015
Official records describe durable cooperation without an active bilateral territorial claim.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record does not establish a national-scale exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.
+20 in 2015 → +33 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
3 points
United States → Bahrain and Bahrain → United States remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
Comprehensive security and prosperity agreement
C-SIPA created a new framework for security consultation, defense integration, economic cooperation and technology ties.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →