United States → Egypt
This score represents United States's relationship toward Egypt. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
2 documented factors produce the +30 security assessment.
Why this score?
- +19.6Long-running military assistance and weapons cooperationBaseline rule · 2015
The presidential readout confirmed continued annual military assistance and the release of F-16, Harpoon and M1A1 equipment within a long-standing security partnership.
- +10Strategic Dialogue broadens institutional cooperationActive event · 2021
The renewed dialogue expanded defense, economic, climate, education, cultural and scientific cooperation while documenting continuing differences.
4 documented factors produce the +66 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +15.7Presidential engagement produced a concrete security decisionBaseline rule · 2015
The two presidents reviewed regional policy and the United States announced concrete military-assistance decisions.
- +7.8Institutional security and regional-policy consultationsBaseline rule · 2015
The official record describes continuing bilateral consultations across security and regional policy.
- +27.4Long-standing strategic partnershipBaseline rule · 2015
Both governments formally characterized the bilateral relationship as a long-standing strategic partnership.
- +15Strategic Dialogue broadens institutional cooperationActive event · 2021
The renewed dialogue expanded defense, economic, climate, education, cultural and scientific cooperation while documenting continuing differences.
2 documented factors produce the +30 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Strategic Dialogue broadens institutional cooperationActive event · 2021
The renewed dialogue expanded defense, economic, climate, education, cultural and scientific cooperation while documenting continuing differences.
- +20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
Coverage gap: 2015 reporter-side goods trade remained below the frozen threshold for an economic baseline rule.
3 documented factors produce the +14 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +39.2Cooperation across regional security prioritiesBaseline rule · 2015
The leaders coordinated on counterterrorism, Libya, Yemen and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict across multiple strategic domains.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +5Strategic Dialogue broadens institutional cooperationActive event · 2021
The renewed dialogue expanded defense, economic, climate, education, cultural and scientific cooperation while documenting continuing differences.
1 documented factor produce the +12 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +11.8Durable cooperative bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015
The official bilateral record documents an institutionalized partnership without an active bilateral territorial claim.
1 documented factor produce the +10 societal assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Strategic Dialogue broadens institutional cooperationActive event · 2021
The renewed dialogue expanded defense, economic, climate, education, cultural and scientific cooperation while documenting continuing differences.
Coverage gap: The reviewed 2015 record does not quantify a national-scale exchange sufficient for the frozen societal rule.
+20 in 2015 → +32 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
0 points
United States → Egypt and Egypt → United States remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →Events affecting the current score
Strategic Dialogue broadens institutional cooperation
The renewed dialogue expanded defense, economic, climate, education, cultural and scientific cooperation while documenting continuing differences.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →