United States → Malaysia
This score represents United States's relationship toward Malaysia. The reverse direction is calculated separately and shown alongside it.
SIX-COMPONENT MODEL
Current component scores
Component values run from −100 to +100 and are combined with the published weights.
No reviewed evidence met this component’s scoring threshold.
Why this score?
The model starts every component at zero. No documented condition or active event currently changes this one.
Coverage gap: The reviewed record documents security cooperation but not exceptional bilateral operational integration under the frozen threshold.
2 documented factors produce the +30 diplomacy assessment.
Why this score?
- +20Presidential visit advances bilateral cooperationBaseline rule · 2015
The leaders agreed concrete cooperation on counterterrorism, trade, climate and peaceful management of regional disputes.
- +10Comprehensive Partnership sustains senior dialogueBaseline rule · 2015
The bilateral framework included regular senior-official consultations across political, economic, education and security portfolios.
2 documented factors produce the +35 economic assessment.
Why this score?
- +15TPP and comprehensive economic cooperation produced outcomesBaseline rule · 2015
The leaders recorded completion of TPP negotiations and continuing trade and investment coordination.
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
2 documented factors produce the -20 alignment assessment.
Why this score?
- +10Cooperation across ASEAN, counterterrorism and climateBaseline rule · 2015
The partners coordinated on violent extremism, ASEAN institutions, climate negotiations and peaceful South China Sea dispute management.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
1 documented factor produce the +15 disputes assessment.
Why this score?
- +15Managed and cooperative bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015
Official bilateral records describe policy differences inside a stable partnership without an active territorial claim between the parties.
1 documented factor produce the +20 societal assessment.
Why this score?
- +20National education and youth exchangesBaseline rule · 2015
The Comprehensive Partnership renewed national English-teaching, education and youth-engagement programs.
+11 in 2015 → +11 in 2026
The change is generated from sourced events and frozen scoring rules, not retrospective editorial adjustment.
2 points
United States → Malaysia and Malaysia → United States remain independent assessments.
View the reverse direction →ACTIVE EVIDENCE
Events affecting the current score
No later scored event is active. The current result remains anchored to the reviewed 2015 baseline and quantitative series.
This analytical score is not an objective fact, endorsement or prediction. Confidence reflects evidence coverage, while incomplete or unavailable observations remain explicit. Differences below 5 points are treated as practical ties rather than a meaningful ranking.
Explore the full timeline and sources in the atlas →