China → Corea del Sur
Esta puntuación representa la relación de China hacia Corea del Sur. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -0.05THAAD dispute strains bilateral relationsActive event · 2017 · resumen original
The official consultation record acknowledges serious Chinese security concerns and the need to restore exchanges after the deployment dispute.
- +0.01Strategic communication and exchanges resumeActive event · 2017 · resumen original
Consultations and the presidential state visit restore high-level communication while leaving the THAAD disagreement unresolved.
Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed 2015 record documented regional-security coordination but not a frozen-v1 alliance, rivalry or operational guardrail rule.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20The presidents reviewed and expanded the strategic cooperative partnershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The presidents reviewed and expanded the strategic cooperative partnership.
- +10Leader, governmental and regional-policy channels maintained regular coordinationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Leader, governmental and regional-policy channels maintained regular coordination.
- +35Both governments reaffirmed a strategic cooperative partnershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Both governments reaffirmed a strategic cooperative partnership.
- -0.05THAAD dispute strains bilateral relationsActive event · 2017 · resumen original
The official consultation record acknowledges serious Chinese security concerns and the need to restore exchanges after the deployment dispute.
- +0.03Strategic communication and exchanges resumeActive event · 2017 · resumen original
Consultations and the presidential state visit restore high-level communication while leaving the THAAD disagreement unresolved.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +35Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- -15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10The governments coordinated on Korean Peninsula stability and Northeast Asian cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The governments coordinated on Korean Peninsula stability and Northeast Asian cooperation.
Ninguna regla o acontecimiento revisado desplaza este componente desde cero.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
El modelo inicia cada componente en cero y no se ha documentado una condición que lo modifique.
Laguna de cobertura: Maritime delimitation remained under negotiation, so neither the settled-order nor unresolved-territorial-dispute rule was activated.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Official records documented expanding cultural and people-to-people exchangeBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Official records documented expanding cultural and people-to-people exchange.
- -0.03THAAD dispute strains bilateral relationsActive event · 2017 · resumen original
The official consultation record acknowledges serious Chinese security concerns and the need to restore exchanges after the deployment dispute.
- +0.01Strategic communication and exchanges resumeActive event · 2017 · resumen original
Consultations and the presidential state visit restore high-level communication while leaving the THAAD disagreement unresolved.
+21 en 2015 → +18 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
3 puntos
Las direcciones CHN → KOR y KOR → CHN son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →