Japón → Corea del Sur
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Japón hacia Corea del Sur. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
- +5Camp David institutionalises trilateral coordinationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Japan, Korea and the United States establish enduring consultation and cooperation across security, economic resilience and people-to-people ties.
Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed 2015 record documented security coordination, but no bilateral mutual-defence treaty or exceptional integrated command under the frozen rubric.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20The first bilateral leaders' summit of the administration addressed cooperation and outstanding issuesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The first bilateral leaders' summit of the administration addressed cooperation and outstanding issues.
- +10Summit, ministerial and director-general channels produced sustained bilateral consultationsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Summit, ministerial and director-general channels produced sustained bilateral consultations.
- -15Historical and claims issues remained serious constraints on bilateral relationsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Historical and claims issues remained serious constraints on bilateral relations.
- +20Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
- +5Camp David institutionalises trilateral coordinationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Japan, Korea and the United States establish enduring consultation and cooperation across security, economic resilience and people-to-people ties.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- +15Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
Laguna de cobertura: Trade crossed the material threshold, but the reviewed record did not justify a separate institutional-economic rule.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10The governments coordinated on North Korea and regional securityBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The governments coordinated on North Korea and regional security.
- +30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +15Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
- +5Camp David institutionalises trilateral coordinationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Japan, Korea and the United States establish enduring consultation and cooperation across security, economic resilience and people-to-people ties.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -50The source government maintained an official sovereignty position opposed by the other stateBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The source government maintained an official sovereignty position opposed by the other state.
- +15The 2015 agreement and continuing consultations created formal mechanisms for managing historical disputesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The 2015 agreement and continuing consultations created formal mechanisms for managing historical disputes.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Hundreds of official arts, academic, youth and sports exchange projects operatedBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Hundreds of official arts, academic, youth and sports exchange projects operated.
- +10Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
+8 en 2015 → +23 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
0 puntos
Las direcciones JPN → KOR y KOR → JPN son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →