Corea del Sur → Japón
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Corea del Sur hacia Japón. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
- +5Camp David institutionalises trilateral coordinationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Japan, Korea and the United States establish enduring consultation and cooperation across security, economic resilience and people-to-people ties.
Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed 2015 record documented security coordination, but no bilateral mutual-defence treaty or exceptional integrated command under the frozen rubric.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20The first bilateral leaders' summit of the administration addressed cooperation and outstanding issuesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The first bilateral leaders' summit of the administration addressed cooperation and outstanding issues.
- +10Summit, ministerial and director-general channels produced sustained bilateral consultationsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Summit, ministerial and director-general channels produced sustained bilateral consultations.
- -15Historical and claims issues remained serious constraints on bilateral relationsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Historical and claims issues remained serious constraints on bilateral relations.
- +20Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
- +5Camp David institutionalises trilateral coordinationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Japan, Korea and the United States establish enduring consultation and cooperation across security, economic resilience and people-to-people ties.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- +15Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
Laguna de cobertura: Trade crossed the material threshold, but the reviewed record did not justify a separate institutional-economic rule.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10The governments coordinated on North Korea and regional securityBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The governments coordinated on North Korea and regional security.
- +30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +15Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
- +5Camp David institutionalises trilateral coordinationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Japan, Korea and the United States establish enduring consultation and cooperation across security, economic resilience and people-to-people ties.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -50The source government maintained an official sovereignty position opposed by the other stateBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The source government maintained an official sovereignty position opposed by the other state.
- +15The 2015 agreement and continuing consultations created formal mechanisms for managing historical disputesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The 2015 agreement and continuing consultations created formal mechanisms for managing historical disputes.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Hundreds of official arts, academic, youth and sports exchange projects operatedBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Hundreds of official arts, academic, youth and sports exchange projects operated.
- +10Shuttle diplomacy and structured cooperation resumeActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The leaders restore frequent visits and restart bilateral security, strategic and economic-security dialogues.
+8 en 2015 → +23 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
0 puntos
Las direcciones KOR → JPN y JPN → KOR son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →