Arabia Saudí → Irán
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Arabia Saudí hacia Irán. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40Saudi official policy identified sustained Iranian regional conduct as a security challengeBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Saudi official policy identified sustained Iranian regional conduct as a security challenge.
- +15Diplomatic relations and formal cooperation are restoredActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The Beijing agreement reopened embassies and reactivated security and general-cooperation agreements; implementation records confirm renewed exchanges.
- -30Regional attacks renew bilateral security frictionActive event · 2026 · resumen original
Current official records preserve the source government's distinct account of attacks, responsibility and regional escalation after the earlier normalization.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -15Regional intervention and competing security positions produced serious political frictionBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Regional intervention and competing security positions produced serious political friction.
- -15Official correspondence documented an unresolved bilateral maritime-negotiation disputeBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Official correspondence documented an unresolved bilateral maritime-negotiation dispute.
- +45Diplomatic relations and formal cooperation are restoredActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The Beijing agreement reopened embassies and reactivated security and general-cooperation agreements; implementation records confirm renewed exchanges.
- -20Regional attacks renew bilateral security frictionActive event · 2026 · resumen original
Current official records preserve the source government's distinct account of attacks, responsibility and regional escalation after the earlier normalization.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Diplomatic relations and formal cooperation are restoredActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The Beijing agreement reopened embassies and reactivated security and general-cooperation agreements; implementation records confirm renewed exchanges.
Laguna de cobertura: 2015 goods trade was below the frozen material-trade threshold.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Diplomatic relations and formal cooperation are restoredActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The Beijing agreement reopened embassies and reactivated security and general-cooperation agreements; implementation records confirm renewed exchanges.
- -20Regional attacks renew bilateral security frictionActive event · 2026 · resumen original
Current official records preserve the source government's distinct account of attacks, responsibility and regional escalation after the earlier normalization.
Laguna de cobertura: No frozen-v1 territorial rule was activated for the bilateral relationship.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10Diplomatic relations and formal cooperation are restoredActive event · 2023 · resumen original
The Beijing agreement reopened embassies and reactivated security and general-cooperation agreements; implementation records confirm renewed exchanges.
Laguna de cobertura: Reviewed official sources did not establish national-scale people-to-people programs.
-14 en 2015 → -12 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
16 puntos
Las direcciones SAU → IRN y IRN → SAU son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →