THE WORLD, CONNECTED
RELACIÓN DIRECCIONAL · 2026

Reino Unido → Estados Unidos

Esta puntuación representa la relación de Reino Unido hacia Estados Unidos. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.

GBR → USA+68Partner95% de confianza
USA → GBR+68PartnerSin diferencia significativa
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES

Puntuaciones actuales

Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.

Seguridad+95

3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +60NATO collective-defence obligation
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The United Kingdom and United States remained bound by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.

  2. +25United States is the UK's pre-eminent security partner
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The UK security strategy documents exceptional nuclear, intelligence, planning and operational interoperability with the United States.

  3. +10AUKUS defence partnership launched
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The new trilateral partnership deepens UK defence, technology and Indo-Pacific security integration with the United States.

Diplomacia+70

4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +20Leaders reaffirm the bilateral partnership
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The two leaders jointly described the relationship as a foundation of shared security and prosperity.

  2. +35Pre-eminent foreign-policy partnership
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The UK strategy formally identifies the United States as its pre-eminent partner for security, defence, foreign policy and prosperity.

  3. +10New Atlantic Charter
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The leaders renew their shared framework for democracy, security, trade, technology and the international order.

  4. +5Atlantic Declaration
    Active event · 2023 · resumen original

    A new economic-security framework expands cooperation on supply chains, critical technologies, defence and clean energy.

Economía+65

3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +15Institutional economic cooperation
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The leaders documented joint work on transatlantic trade, finance and shared prosperity.

  2. +35Bilateral trade threshold
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.

  3. +15Atlantic Declaration
    Active event · 2023 · resumen original

    A new economic-security framework expands cooperation on supply chains, critical technologies, defence and clean energy.

Alineamiento internacional+65

5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +50Broad strategic alignment
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The leaders documented aligned action on defence, counterterrorism, global health, trade and international crises.

  2. +15United Nations voting alignment
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.

  3. +10New Atlantic Charter
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The leaders renew their shared framework for democracy, security, trade, technology and the international order.

  4. +5AUKUS defence partnership launched
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The new trilateral partnership deepens UK defence, technology and Indo-Pacific security integration with the United States.

  5. -15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculation
    Annual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original

    The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.

CAMBIO DESDE 2015

+59 en 2015 → +68 en 2026

El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.

Interprétalo con cautela

Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.

Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →