Estados Unidos → Reino Unido
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Estados Unidos hacia Reino Unido. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +60NATO collective-defence obligationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The United States and United Kingdom remained bound by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.
- +25Unparalleled defence and intelligence cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The UK security strategy identified the United States as its pre-eminent partner and documented exceptional nuclear, intelligence and military interoperability.
- +10AUKUS defence partnership launchedActive event · 2021 · resumen original
The new trilateral partnership deepens defence, technology and Indo-Pacific security integration.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Leaders reaffirm the bilateral partnershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The two leaders jointly described the relationship as a foundation of shared security and prosperity.
- +35Pre-eminent foreign-policy partnershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The UK strategy formally identified the United States as its pre-eminent partner for security, defence, foreign policy and prosperity.
- +10New Atlantic CharterActive event · 2021 · resumen original
The leaders renewed their shared framework for democracy, security, trade, technology and the international order.
- +5Atlantic DeclarationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
A new economic-security framework expands cooperation on supply chains, critical technologies, defence and clean energy.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Institutional economic cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The leaders documented joint work on transatlantic trade, finance and shared prosperity.
- +35Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- +15Atlantic DeclarationActive event · 2023 · resumen original
A new economic-security framework expands cooperation on supply chains, critical technologies, defence and clean energy.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +50Broad strategic alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The leaders documented aligned action on defence, counterterrorism, global health, trade and international crises.
- +15United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- +10New Atlantic CharterActive event · 2021 · resumen original
The leaders renewed their shared framework for democracy, security, trade, technology and the international order.
- +5AUKUS defence partnership launchedActive event · 2021 · resumen original
The new trilateral partnership deepens defence, technology and Indo-Pacific security integration.
- -15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Durable cooperative bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The official bilateral account describes an alliance and partnership without an active territorial or sovereignty dispute.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +35Exceptional societal relationshipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The joint account describes durable connections spanning science, shared institutions, values and public life.
+59 en 2015 → +68 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
0 puntos
Las direcciones USA → GBR y GBR → USA son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →