THE WORLD, CONNECTED
RELACIÓN DIRECCIONAL · 2026

Afganistán → Estados Unidos

Esta puntuación representa la relación de Afganistán hacia Estados Unidos. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.

AFG → USA-21Competitiva95% de confianza
USA → AFG-21CompetitivaSin diferencia significativa
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES

Puntuaciones actuales

Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.

Seguridad-15

2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +25Exceptional security integration during the NATO mission
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    In 2015 the United States maintained unusually deep operational and security involvement with the Afghan government.

  2. -40Taliban takeover ends ordinary government relations
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The fall of the Afghan government, U.S. withdrawal and suspension of embassy operations ended the 2015 security and diplomatic framework; the United States does not recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's government.

Diplomacia-35

2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +10Standing bilateral dialogue
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    Senior diplomatic and security channels regularly coordinated the bilateral agenda in 2015.

  2. -45Taliban takeover ends ordinary government relations
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The fall of the Afghan government, U.S. withdrawal and suspension of embassy operations ended the 2015 security and diplomatic framework; the United States does not recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's government.

Economía-15

1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. -15Taliban takeover ends ordinary government relations
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The fall of the Afghan government, U.S. withdrawal and suspension of embassy operations ended the 2015 security and diplomatic framework; the United States does not recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's government.

Laguna de cobertura: 2015 reporter-side trade remained below the frozen threshold or was unavailable, and no qualifying standing bilateral economic institution was evidenced.

Alineamiento internacional-55

2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. -30United Nations voting alignment
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.

  2. -25Taliban takeover ends ordinary government relations
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The fall of the Afghan government, U.S. withdrawal and suspension of embassy operations ended the 2015 security and diplomatic framework; the United States does not recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's government.

Disputas+15

1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. +15Managed bilateral relationship
    Baseline rule · 2015 · resumen original

    The two governments had no bilateral territorial claim and managed disagreements through a continuing cooperative framework.

Vínculos sociales-10

1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.

¿Por qué esta puntuación?
  1. -10Taliban takeover ends ordinary government relations
    Active event · 2021 · resumen original

    The fall of the Afghan government, U.S. withdrawal and suspension of embassy operations ended the 2015 security and diplomatic framework; the United States does not recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's government.

Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed record does not establish a national-scale people-to-people exchange meeting the frozen societal threshold.

CAMBIO DESDE 2015

+8 en 2015 → -21 en 2026

El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.

Interprétalo con cautela

Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.

Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →