China → India
Esta puntuación representa la relación de China hacia India. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40Armed forces face an unresolved boundaryBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The joint statement treats boundary settlement as a strategic objective and records military-facing confidence mechanisms pending resolution.
- +15Border defence confidence mechanismsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The parties committed to military exchanges, a headquarters hotline and additional border meeting points.
- -40LAC crisis and Galwan clashActive event · 2020 · resumen original
Attempts to alter the status quo and the lethal Galwan confrontation sharply worsen security and diplomacy.
- +22Depsang and Demchok disengagementActive event · 2024 · resumen original
The patrolling arrangement resolves the 2020 friction points while the broader boundary dispute remains.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Prime-ministerial visit expands the partnershipBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Prime Minister Modi’s China visit produced a broad joint statement and twenty-four governmental agreements.
- +10Dense institutional dialogueBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The relationship included leader, strategic, border, economic, military, provincial and people-to-people mechanisms.
- -15Boundary, visa and river concerns remainBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The official visit record acknowledges unresolved differences that required continued management.
- -28LAC crisis and Galwan clashActive event · 2020 · resumen original
Attempts to alter the status quo and the lethal Galwan confrontation sharply worsen security and diplomacy.
- +26Depsang and Demchok disengagementActive event · 2024 · resumen original
The patrolling arrangement resolves the 2020 friction points while the broader boundary dispute remains.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Commercial agreements and development mechanismsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The annual report records twenty-six commercial agreements worth approximately $22bn alongside governmental cooperation.
- -15Large trade imbalance remains a concernBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
India raised its growing trade deficit and sought improved market access during the leaders’ talks.
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- -20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -50Boundary settlement remains unresolvedBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Both parties formally identified the boundary question as an outstanding strategic issue requiring political settlement.
- +15Formal boundary-management architectureBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Special Representatives, working mechanisms and border protocols provided institutional dispute management.
- -30LAC crisis and Galwan clashActive event · 2020 · resumen original
Attempts to alter the status quo and the lethal Galwan confrontation sharply worsen security and diplomacy.
- +20Depsang and Demchok disengagementActive event · 2024 · resumen original
The patrolling arrangement resolves the 2020 friction points while the broader boundary dispute remains.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Education, youth, pilgrimage and cultural exchangesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The parties expanded education programs, annual youth exchanges, pilgrimage access and cultural institutions.
- -10LAC crisis and Galwan clashActive event · 2020 · resumen original
Attempts to alter the status quo and the lethal Galwan confrontation sharply worsen security and diplomacy.
-4 en 2015 → -15 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
5 puntos
Las direcciones CHN → IND y IND → CHN son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →