China → Estados Unidos
Esta puntuación representa la relación de China hacia Estados Unidos. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40U.S. regional military posture raises concernBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
China's defence white paper identified the U.S. rebalance, military presence and alliances as major regional security concerns.
- +15Military safety and crisis guardrailsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The leaders completed operational safety annexes and strengthened crisis communications.
- -40U.S. strategy prioritises ChinaActive event · 2021 · resumen original
U.S. defence strategy deepens Beijing's perception of military pressure and strategic containment.
- -35Advanced semiconductor controlsActive event · 2022 · resumen original
U.S. national-security controls constrain Chinese technology access and industrial capacity.
- -8Technology controls broadenActive event · 2024 · resumen original
Additional semiconductor manufacturing controls deepen the economic-security dispute.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20State visit produces bilateral commitmentsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The presidents documented cooperation across security, development, health, climate and bilateral relations.
- +10Standing strategic and economic dialoguesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Official records document recurring senior channels with concrete outcomes during 2015.
- -15Cyber and maritime friction remainsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The state-visit record documents material unresolved disputes despite extensive dialogue.
- -12Section 301 tariffs imposedActive event · 2018 · resumen original
U.S. tariffs turn economic friction into a durable coercive instrument from China's direction.
- +14High-level dialogue resumesActive event · 2023 · resumen original
Restored leader and working-level channels partly repair diplomacy without removing structural competition.
7 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Institutional economic cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The JCCT and Strategic and Economic Dialogue produced documented trade and investment outcomes.
- -15Material trade-policy disputesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Official compliance records identify multiple consequential disputes across market access, investment and technology policy.
- +50Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- -32Advanced semiconductor controlsActive event · 2022 · resumen original
U.S. national-security controls constrain Chinese technology access and industrial capacity.
- -52Section 301 tariffs imposedActive event · 2018 · resumen original
U.S. tariffs turn economic friction into a durable coercive instrument from China's direction.
- -14Technology controls broadenActive event · 2024 · resumen original
Additional semiconductor manufacturing controls deepen the economic-security dispute.
- -15Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +10Broad global-issues cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Joint commitments covered climate, development, peacekeeping, nuclear security, health and humanitarian response.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- -40U.S. strategy prioritises ChinaActive event · 2021 · resumen original
U.S. defence strategy deepens Beijing's perception of military pressure and strategic containment.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40U.S. maritime presence viewed as coercive pressureBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
China's official strategy identified external surveillance and involvement in maritime disputes as a sustained challenge to its interests.
- -20Cyber conduct remains disputedBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The leaders addressed cyber-enabled theft and established an escalation mechanism.
- +15Cyber and military escalation guardrailsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The parties adopted hotlines, expert dialogue and operational safety measures to manage escalation risks.
- -25U.S. strategy prioritises ChinaActive event · 2021 · resumen original
U.S. defence strategy deepens Beijing's perception of military pressure and strategic containment.
- -15Advanced semiconductor controlsActive event · 2022 · resumen original
U.S. national-security controls constrain Chinese technology access and industrial capacity.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20National-scale education and tourism initiativesBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The Tourism Year and One Million Strong initiatives sought to expand travel and education links.
-7 en 2015 → -61 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
4 puntos
Las direcciones CHN → USA y USA → CHN son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →