Estados Unidos → Pakistán
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Estados Unidos hacia Pakistán. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +25Institutionalized defense and counterterrorism cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The joint statement documented defense consultations, military exchanges, exercises and sustained counterterrorism cooperation.
- -25Most U.S. security assistance suspendedActive event · 2018 · resumen original
The United States suspended most security assistance over inadequate action against militant and terrorist groups, while narrower counterterrorism cooperation continued.
- +10Cooperation consolidates around civilian, economic and counterterrorism prioritiesActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The bilateral agenda retained counterterrorism and border-security work while expanding trade, investment, health, climate, development and people-to-people programs.
5 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Leader visit produced a broad joint agendaBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The leaders reached documented outcomes on security, nuclear risk, energy, trade, education and regional policy.
- +10Strategic Dialogue and ministerial working groupsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A recurring Strategic Dialogue operated through specialized working groups and defense consultations.
- -15Serious unresolved concerns over militant groupsBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The joint statement recorded continuing U.S. concerns and commitments concerning terrorist groups operating from Pakistani territory.
- -10Most U.S. security assistance suspendedActive event · 2018 · resumen original
The United States suspended most security assistance over inadequate action against militant and terrorist groups, while narrower counterterrorism cooperation continued.
- +10Cooperation consolidates around civilian, economic and counterterrorism prioritiesActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The bilateral agenda retained counterterrorism and border-security work while expanding trade, investment, health, climate, development and people-to-people programs.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Institutional economic and energy cooperationBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The Strategic Dialogue included economic, finance and energy working groups with concrete investment and market-access initiatives.
- +15Cooperation consolidates around civilian, economic and counterterrorism prioritiesActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The bilateral agenda retained counterterrorism and border-security work while expanding trade, investment, health, climate, development and people-to-people programs.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +15Durable institutional bilateral orderBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The relationship maintained diplomatic, strategic and defense institutions without an active bilateral territorial claim.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Large education and professional exchange architectureBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Official programs included the world's largest Fulbright cohort and extensive university and professional exchanges.
- +10Cooperation consolidates around civilian, economic and counterterrorism prioritiesActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The bilateral agenda retained counterterrorism and border-security work while expanding trade, investment, health, climate, development and people-to-people programs.
+11 en 2015 → +9 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
3 puntos
Las direcciones USA → PAK y PAK → USA son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →