Rusia → Estados Unidos
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Rusia hacia Estados Unidos. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40U.S. and NATO pressure identified as a security threatBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Russia's national security strategy identifies U.S. military systems, NATO expansion and political-military pressure as threats to Russian security.
- -50War and Western support produce systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
Russia's official address frames the United States and NATO as the central external security confrontation as the invasion begins.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -15Russian strategy documents sustained U.S. pressureBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The official strategy describes political, economic, military and information pressure by the United States and its allies.
- -40War and Western support produce systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
Russia's official address frames the United States and NATO as the central external security confrontation as the invasion begins.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40U.S. sectoral sanctions constrain RussiaBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
U.S. sanctions created continuing financial and sectoral restrictions from Russia's directional perspective.
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- -50War and Western support produce systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
Russia's official address frames the United States and NATO as the central external security confrontation as the invasion begins.
- -20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -50Opposing visions of the European security orderBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Russia's strategy documents direct opposition to U.S. containment policy, NATO expansion and missile-defence deployments.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- -35War and Western support produce systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
Russia's official address frames the United States and NATO as the central external security confrontation as the invasion begins.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -25War and Western support produce systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
Russia's official address frames the United States and NATO as the central external security confrontation as the invasion begins.
Laguna de cobertura: The 2015 strategic confrontation involved third-country security questions rather than a bilateral territorial claim covered by the frozen Disputes rules.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -12War and Western support produce systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
Russia's official address frames the United States and NATO as the central external security confrontation as the invasion begins.
Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed 2015 official records did not activate a frozen v1 societal rule.
-32 en 2015 → -74 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
7 puntos
Las direcciones RUS → USA y USA → RUS son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →