Estados Unidos → Rusia
Esta puntuación representa la relación de Estados Unidos hacia Rusia. La dirección inversa se calcula de forma independiente.
MODELO DE SEIS COMPONENTES
Puntuaciones actuales
Los valores van de −100 a +100 y se combinan con los pesos publicados.
2 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40Russian military posture challenges European securityBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The U.S. strategy identifies Russia's aggression and strategic capabilities as a sustained challenge requiring deterrence and reassurance.
- -45Full-scale invasion produces systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The United States responds to Russia's invasion with extensive sanctions and large-scale security support for Ukraine.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- +20Obama–Putin meeting maintains direct diplomacyBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The presidents met at the United Nations with Ukraine and implementation of the Minsk agreements as the central bilateral issue.
- -15Ukraine drives serious political frictionBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The White House documented an isolation policy and sanctions in response to Russia's continuing actions in eastern Ukraine.
- -35Full-scale invasion produces systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The United States responds to Russia's invasion with extensive sanctions and large-scale security support for Ukraine.
4 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -40Sectoral sanctions remain activeBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
U.S. sanctions imposed costs in response to Russia's actions against Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
- +20Bilateral trade thresholdBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
Reported trade activates the absolute methodology route using the latest observation available for this year.
- -45Full-scale invasion produces systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The United States responds to Russia's invasion with extensive sanctions and large-scale security support for Ukraine.
- -20Annual methodology 1.1 recalculationAnnual recalculation · 2026 · resumen original
The current component replaces the 2015 quantitative threshold or time-bounded structural package with the evidence applicable in the selected year.
3 factores documentados explican esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -50Opposing positions on the European security orderBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
The U.S. strategy places the countries on opposing sides of Ukraine's sovereignty and the rules against territorial aggression.
- -30United Nations voting alignmentBaseline rule · 2015 · resumen original
A rolling three-year comparison of UN General Assembly votes activates the alignment threshold.
- -30Full-scale invasion produces systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The United States responds to Russia's invasion with extensive sanctions and large-scale security support for Ukraine.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -25Full-scale invasion produces systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The United States responds to Russia's invasion with extensive sanctions and large-scale security support for Ukraine.
Laguna de cobertura: The central 2015 dispute concerned Russia's actions in Ukraine rather than a bilateral U.S.–Russia territorial claim; no frozen Disputes rule matched without conflating the relationships.
1 factor documentado explica esta puntuación.
¿Por qué esta puntuación?
- -10Full-scale invasion produces systemic confrontationActive event · 2022 · resumen original
The United States responds to Russia's invasion with extensive sanctions and large-scale security support for Ukraine.
Laguna de cobertura: The reviewed 2015 official records did not activate a frozen v1 societal rule.
-28 en 2015 → -67 en 2026
El cambio procede de acontecimientos documentados y reglas fijas, no de ajustes editoriales retrospectivos.
7 puntos
Las direcciones USA → RUS y RUS → USA son evaluaciones independientes.
Ver la dirección inversa →Esta puntuación analítica no es un hecho objetivo, una recomendación ni una predicción. La confianza refleja la cobertura de evidencia y las diferencias inferiores a cinco puntos son empates prácticos.
Explorar la cronología y las fuentes en el mapa →